The ongoing trial of Daniel Asiedu and Vincent Bossu for the murder of the late Member of Parliament, J. B Danquah Adu, has brought to light some crucial details regarding the case. Assistant Superintendent of Police (ASP) Augustus Nkrumah, an investigator in the case, recently provided significant insights during his cross-examination at the High Court.
ASP Nkrumah clarified that his characterization of Daniel Asiedu as a "terrible guy" was not merely his opinion, but rather a reflection of the statements given by the accused themselves. According to the investigator, both Daniel Asiedu and Vincent Bossu admitted to being "thieves" and confessed to planning a "stealing expedition." Furthermore, ASP Nkrumah highlighted the progression from theft to armed robbery based on the offensive implements possessed by the accused.
During the cross-examination, ASP Nkrumah emphasized that the accused's possession of offensive weapons indicated their capability to resist any obstacles during the commission of their crimes. He specifically pointed out that Asiedu's actions, including the use of offensive weapons, suggested a deliberate intent to eliminate any hindrances to his criminal activities.
The investigator firmly maintained that the evidence and admissions pointed to Daniel Asiedu as the perpetrator of the heinous crime. His assertion was supported by the recovery of offensive weapons and belongings linked to the accused. Notably, Daniel Asiedu faces charges of murder and robbery, while Vincent Bossu is accused of conspiring with Asiedu to commit robbery.
The court proceedings revealed that ASP Nkrumah, as the eighth prosecution witness, played a pivotal role in establishing the sequence of events leading to the tragic death of the late MP. He refuted claims that he had formed an opinion regarding Asiedu's guilt without conducting thorough investigations. ASP Nkrumah stressed that investigations at the time had unequivocally pointed to Asiedu as the perpetrator.
In response to questions about his own statement, ASP Nkrumah clarified that while he personally drafted his statement, it had not been tendered as evidence due to the absence of a request to do so. He also denied any selective conduct in his investigations, highlighting the collection of 11 statements, including caution statements, from the accused individuals.
As the trial progresses, the revelations from ASP Nkrumah's testimony shed light on the intricate details surrounding the case. The court has adjourned the matter to March 11, 2024, as the legal proceedings continue to unfold.
The pursuit of justice in such cases necessitates a meticulous examination of evidence and testimonies. The role of investigators like ASP Nkrumah is instrumental in unraveling the truth and ensuring that those responsible for heinous crimes are held accountable within the bounds of the law.
-source GNA | curated by Aisha Yakubu | Ghana Crimes
